GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K1100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K1100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K1100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 255% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1100M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 74 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 1208 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GF114 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |