GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 190% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 34 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2208 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 84% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K2000M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N14P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 23.84 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |