GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 113% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 1208 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K3000M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N14E-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 654 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 31.39 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |