GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K3100M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K3100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 113% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 73 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 808 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K3100M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 45.18 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 44 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |