GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K5100M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K5100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 8 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 408 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K5100M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 771 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 98.69 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 35 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |