GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K5200

When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5200.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 6% more power consumption, than Quadro K5200.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 112 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5200 is 57 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	16−18	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	16−18	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	160−170	250−260
medium / 768p	130−140	220−230
ultra / 1080p	70−75	180−190
QHD / 1440p	40−45	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	100−110	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
medium / 768p	70−75	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	10−12	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	80−85
medium / 1080p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	18−20	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	75−80	180−190
medium / 1080p	30−35	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	16−18	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	65−70	140−150
medium / 768p	55−60	120−130
high / 1080p	18−20	70−75
ultra / 1080p	8−9	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	8−9	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	35−40	130−140
medium / 768p	21−24	85−90
high / 1080p	12−14	45−50
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	50−55
high / 768p	40−45	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF114	GK110B
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 September 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	336	2304
Core clock speed	779 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	43.62	148.0
Floating-point performance	1,045.6 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	210 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.19 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	75 Mh/s	226 Mh/s
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares