GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K620M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K620M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2008 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 52% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K620M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K620M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF114 | GM108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |