GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro M2200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M2200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M2200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 190% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 85 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF114 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |