GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro M500M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M500M.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M500M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 4 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro M500M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M500M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF114 | GM108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 15 December 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 4004 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |