GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro M600M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M600M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M600M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 58 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M600M is 1004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro M600M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro M600M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF114 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 837 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 14.02 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |