GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 7750M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 7750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 28 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 471% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 7750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 204 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 8 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 52% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Lombok XL |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 575 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon HD 7750M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon HD 7750M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs UHD Graphics 617
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
- Radeon HD 7750M vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon HD 7750M vs Radeon R7 Carrizo