GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 8750M
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8750M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8750M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 159 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2008 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 283% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Mars Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 16 November 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 620 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 18.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 71 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |