GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 8970M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8970M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 8970M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 8970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 8970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8970M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 8970M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8970M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 71 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8970M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 792 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Battlefield 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 8970M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Neptune |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 15 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 273 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon HD 8970M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon HD 8970M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 570
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 965M
- Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce GTX 570
- Radeon HD 8970M vs GeForce GTX 965M