GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon Pro 455
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 455. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 455. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 455 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 76 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GF114 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 336 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K5000M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Quadro K5000M
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI