GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 5300M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 5300M.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 88% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5300M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 7992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Navi / RDNA |
| Code name | GF114 | Navi 14 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 13 November 2019 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 100.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro M3000M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 1050
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro M3000M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050