GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GF114 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 336 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K2000D
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M