GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R6 Carrizo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R6 Carrizo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R6 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R6 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R6 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R6 Carrizo | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1233% more power consumption, than Radeon R6 Carrizo.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R6 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R6 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R6 Carrizo - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R6 Carrizo have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R6 Carrizo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 106% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R6 Carrizo | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | Carrizo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 4 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2410 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R6 Carrizo vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R6 Carrizo vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 280
- Radeon R6 Carrizo vs GeForce 840M
- Radeon R6 Carrizo vs GeForce GTX 280