GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R7 M270
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R7 M270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R7 M270.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 46 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |