GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R7 M370
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R7 M370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 96 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 3008 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M370. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Litho |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 875 MHz |
Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 70 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |