GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M370X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M370X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Radeon R9 M370X, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M370X has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 21 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M370X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 492 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M370X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GF114 | Cape Verde |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 19 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 125 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |