GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M