GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 321 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M385X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R9 M385X vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R9 M385X vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs FirePro M6000
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Radeon R9 M385X vs FirePro M6000
- Radeon R9 M385X vs Iris Plus Graphics 650