GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M390
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M390, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M390 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R9 M390 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M390 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Fortnite is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GF114 | Pitcairn |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 242 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |