GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M395X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M395X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M395X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 56% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 56 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2758 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF114 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 336 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |