GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GF114 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 336 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce MX150
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q