GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 48% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 205 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2050 is 38 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 1008 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 336 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |