GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 54% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tesla C2075 are build with Fermi 2.0 architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 205 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 38 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
160−170
210−220
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
QHD / 1440p
40−45
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
80−85
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
35−40
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF114
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
24 September 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
336
448
Core clock speed
779 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
43.62
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,045.6 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
210 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4008 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.19 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
75 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
