GeForce GTX 460 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
768 MB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460 has 255% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 460 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 460 has 640 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 460 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 460 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 460 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
160−170
medium / 768p
150−160
130−140
ultra / 1080p
75−80
65−70
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
5−6
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
40−45
30−35
medium / 768p
24−27
21−24
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
high / 768p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GF104
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
12 July 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
336
40
Core clock speed
675 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
37.80
52.00
Floating-point performance
907.2 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.1
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
