FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 225 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | N11E-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |