GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2x1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 567 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M SLI is 251 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Fortnite is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200B | N11E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Iris Graphics 540