GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Quadro 2000D
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro 2000D, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro 2000D.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro 2000D are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M SLI is 50 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro 2000D are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M SLI in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |