FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 460M
When comparing FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 460M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 460M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1532 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3550 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 189% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Pitcairn | N11E-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 16.1 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 33 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |