FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 460M
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 460M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1530 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 450 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tahiti | N11E-GS |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 16.1 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 33 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |