FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 460M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 460M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 460M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 48% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 660 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 460M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N11E-GS |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 16.1 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |