FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 460M
When comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1532 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 420 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bonaire | N11E-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 16.1 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 33 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |