FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 460M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 725 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 736 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N11E-GS |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 16.1 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |