GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
134 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 168% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 460M has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 370 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 1244 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
3−4
20−22
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
10−12
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
N11E-GS
GK106
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
3 September 2010
26 March 2013
Pipelines
192
768
Core clock speed
1350 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
16.1 billion/sec
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
518.4 gflops
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
60.0 GB/s
144.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API with Feature Level 12.1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
33 Mh/s
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price