GeForce GTX 460M vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 605 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |