GeForce GTX 460M vs GRID K280Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K280Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K280Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1532 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 605 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |