GeForce GTX 460M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460M stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 460M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460M has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 1050 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
GeForce GTX 460M and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
1−2
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
8−9
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
16−18
16−18
medium / 768p
10−12
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N11E-GS
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
3 September 2010
2 June 2015
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
1350 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
16.1 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
518.4 gflops
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
60.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API with Feature Level 12.1
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
33 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
