GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro 2000D
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 24% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 725 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |