GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro 7000
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 7000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 7000.
Quadro 7000
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 308% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1530 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 699 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro 7000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 2154 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 271% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF110 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 41.66 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |