GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 460M has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1150 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 385% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
75−80
medium / 1080p
7−8
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
110−120
240−250
medium / 768p
90−95
210−220
ultra / 1080p
45−50
130−140
QHD / 1440p
24−27
100−110
4K / 2160p
−
60−65
high / 768p
65−70
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
3−4
30−33
ultra / 1080p
3−4
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−33
QHD / 1440p
4−5
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
130−140
medium / 1080p
14−16
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 221% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
40−45
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
18−20
75−80
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
−
100−110
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 221% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
7−8
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 625% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
80−85
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
6−7
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
16−18
85−90
medium / 768p
10−12
55−60
high / 1080p
6−7
30−33
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 433% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Fermi
Vega
Code name
N11E-GS
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 September 2010
15 November 2018
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
16.1 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
518.4 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
60.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API with Feature Level 12.1
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
33 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
