GeForce GTX 460M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1528 GB more memory, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 420 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3762 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 614% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 194% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 394% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 660% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 1075% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 777% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N11E-GS | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 September 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |