FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 465

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9370

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 465
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	200 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	Two 6-pins
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 has 12% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 465 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 390 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 465 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FireStream 9370 is 258 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2997 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	30−33
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	200−210
medium / 768p	160−170	170−180
ultra / 1080p	85−90	95−100
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	120−130	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 465 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	85−90	95−100
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	80−85
medium / 768p	65−70	70−75
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	9−10
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−12	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
medium / 768p	27−30	30−35
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 465
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Cypress	GF100
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	23 June 2010	31 May 2010
Pipelines	1600	352
Core clock speed	825 MHz	1215 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	26.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	855.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	102.6 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		+
CUDA cores		352
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options		+
Multi monitor support		+
HDMI		+
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		64 Mh/s
Compute performance		30x
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 465

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares