GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 850M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 850M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 344% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 850M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−33
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
190−200
medium / 768p
170−180
160−170
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
QHD / 1440p
50−55
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
130−140
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
95−100
90−95
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
8−9
7−8
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
70−75
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
2−3
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
9−10
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
medium / 768p
30−35
30−33
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
50−55
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 850M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
N15P-GT
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
12 March 2014
Pipelines
352
640
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
36.08
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
1,155 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
80.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
352
640
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
153 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
DDR3 or GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.8 Mh/s
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
