GeForce GTX 465 vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 465 and GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GRID K160Q
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
130 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 53% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 465 and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 365 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 179 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
9−10
medium / 1080p
18−20
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
8−9
medium / 1080p
24−27
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 725% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
100−110
medium / 768p
170−180
75−80
ultra / 1080p
95−100
30−35
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
9−10
high / 768p
130−140
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
100−110
65−70
medium / 768p
90−95
35−40
ultra / 1080p
60−65
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
6−7
medium / 1080p
18−20
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
low / 720p
95−100
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 226% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
10−12
medium / 1080p
27−30
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
80−85
35−40
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
50−55
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
50−55
3−4
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
18−20
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
100−110
65−70
medium / 768p
60−65
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−11
high / 768p
50−55
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
GRID K160Q
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
GK107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
28 June 2013
Pipelines
352
192
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
28.51 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Compute performance
30x
Check Price