GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 344% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 1015 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
160−170
medium / 768p
170−180
130−140
ultra / 1080p
95−100
65−70
QHD / 1440p
50−55
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
130−140
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
70−75
ultra / 1080p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
70−75
medium / 1080p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
30−35
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
30−35
medium / 768p
30−35
21−24
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GF100
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
352
40
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
