GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro 2000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 263% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro 2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 665 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 2000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 703 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
1−2
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
60−65
medium / 768p
170−180
27−30
ultra / 1080p
95−100
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
10−11
ultra / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
low / 768p
80−85
18−20
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
55−60
8−9
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
50−55
0−1
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
22 February 2011
Pipelines
352
192
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
17.60
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price