GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 4000M are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 740 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 403 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
7−8
ultra / 1080p
20−22
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
45−50
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
55−60
medium / 1080p
50−55
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
18−20
6−7
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
7−8
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
50−55
16−18
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
22 February 2011
Pipelines
352
336
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
26.60
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
638.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
